Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Straw Dogs Remake Trailer

The remake of the controversial Sam Pekinpaugh movie is coming out soon and the first trailer has been released. It looks pretty good so far. It is dark but so was the original. Dustin Hoffman's role as a cowardly man pushed to his limits is now in the hands of James Marsden. Marsden is a pretty good actor and I am looking forward to see how he does..

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part Two

I am a biased fan of this series but this trailer looks like an amazing end to a very good series based on a great series of books. It was the best book easily and this looks like it may be the best film.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

I Love You Phillip Morris

"i love you phillip morris movie poster" I really really wanted to like this movie more than I did. I had followed its production for a while and had lots of good things about it. It was presented as a Catch Me If You Can with Jim Carrey playing a crazy gay southern con man.
The good: I Love You Phillip Morris contains many funny moments and a very good performance from Jim Carrey. Carrey is good when he takes risk, (The Truman Show, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Man on the Moon are all good examples) and pretty annoyingly bad when he sticks to his shtick (Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls, Yes Man, Me Myself and Irene and many others). So when I heard he was playing the main character in this comedy based on a true story about a gay conman who falls in love with a fellow prisoner and does whatever he can to be with him I was intrigued.
Jim Carrey is very funny (even if he doesn’t have the best southern accent) and Ewan Mcgregor is equally entertaining as the object of Carrey’s affection.
The bad: This movie could have been much shorter. It felt like the filmmakers were to in love with their material and did not know when to make tough cuts. I found myself multiple times looking at the timer on the Bluray player wondering how it had only been on 30 minutes, 35 minutes, 45 minutes, etc… If the movie was a little more focused and not as intent on including every step of this guys journey it would have been much more enjoyable.

It's Kind of a Funny Story

its-kind-of-a-funny-story-poster It’s Kind of a Funny Story is a very entertaining film that suffers from a bad name. The marketing campaign did not help either. Fresh off of the mammoth success of The Hangover this movie’s advertising relied heavily on the fact that it featured Zack Galifinakis. While he is funny in this film and there are many very humorous scenes it is not mainly a comedy.
The story follows a young suicidal man who checks himself into a mental hospital thinking he can get helped or medicated quickly and be back in school on Monday. Unfortunately he finds out that he is being admitted for observation and will not be able to leave for at least five days. There he meets a variety of other patients and learns a lot about himself. The main patient he bonds with is a middle aged man who has attempted suicide multiple times and acts as a glimpse of what our young protagonist could become. The man is portrayed by Zach Galifinakis who turns in a very fleshed out and subtle performance. The main thing I walked away thinking was, “Wow, Zach Galifinakis is very good actor, it’s a shame people only want him to play the same weirdo over and over again.”
I recommend this movie for its heart, humor and interesting characters. It plays out like a lighter, younger version of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest with a dash of a Garden State type romance thrown in.

Saturday, April 2, 2011

The Hangover Part Two Trailer


I am not sure if it is going to be any good. It is pretty hard to match the quality and number of laughs as the orignal when making a comedy sequal. This trailer however is pretty funny. Some of the moments reminded me too much of the original as I was hoping they would go in a more original directions but I am still looking forward to this as of now. What do you think?

Friday, April 1, 2011

Red State

A lot has  been spoken about the way Kevin Smith is releasing his new film Red State. I want to step away from that aspect of the film and just focus on the movie itself. Does it work as a movie, not as a new way of releasing films. If I was to answer that question simply, the answer would be a resounding "Yes". The movie works amazingly well on its own.

However at the same time I would also respond to the question, "Is this a movie for most people?" with a tentative, "no". There are a lot of people who would be offended by the opening of the film where a group of teenagers discuss sexual matters that are perverse, but funny. This same audience would probably be offended as the film progressed at the portrayal of fundamentalist Christians being just as dangerous as religious fanatics of other faiths.

The movie is a very original film, it is different (very very far from anything Smith has ever done) and it is also a bit schizophrenic. It changes moods and styles frequently. The movie begins as a comedy. A comedy much like Smith’s earlier works only with a grittier more realistic feel. A trio of loser friends (Nicholas Braun, Michael Angarano, Kyle Gallner)  in a small town high school set out on a Friday night to meet a women from the internet who has promised a night of sexual exploration. Once they arrive they are drugged and the movie takes a swift turn into a very dark very, very intense horror film. If the intensity of this mid sequence had been maintained for the rest of the film I have to say it may have been too much for me to handle. It is during this section that we get to see the religious cult at the center of this film worshipping and going into action in their battle against homosexuals. It is painful yet incredibly well done.

However, keeping with the schizophrenic feel, the film switches moods again and turns into a scathing attack on the way the American government deals with religious groups. John Goodman steps into the spotlight portraying a conflicted ATF that has been tracking the “Church” and is forced into a very violent standoff due to the mistake of an inept sheriff portrayed by Stephen Root.

Feeling a lot like a mix of Tarentino and Coen Brothers, the film closes up in a denouement that is surprisingly funny. It felt to me like Smith bookended the film with two more comic sequences to let the audience ease into the beginning and relax in the end.

At the heart of the film is Michael Parks. He portrays the leader of the religious group Abin Cooper. He is loosely based on the real life preacher and spreader of hate Fred Phelps. Although watching this film Cooper (while killing many innocents) seems much more charismatic than the real life Phelps. His performance is funny, haunting and powerful. I had been impressed seeing him in multiple Tarentino and Robert Rodriguez films. Here he is given center stage and he knocks it out of the park. Besides Parks the cast is strong across the board. The three young men all go from being unsympathetic losers to realistic and flawed victims. Goodman is very strong as the weathered broken agent who wants to do good and is not sure how. Fresh off her Oscar win Melissa Leo is once again convincing as a horrible controlling mother (like she was in The Fighter) and loyal daughter to The cult leader.

I really hope that when this movie comes out in October it gets the audience and the respect it deserves. It is experimental and divisive in the best way. As a very big fan of Smith I have to say this is hands down his biggest risk, his most techinically proficient film and maybe his best film altogether.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Never Let Me Go

"Never Let Me Go Poster"What if you mixed a merchant ivory film with a sci-fi film? What if Jane Austin had written Logan’s Run? Never Let Me Go is what you would probably get. Based on the popular novel, Never Let Me Go explores topics of love, life and the importance of both.
Writing this review roughly 30 minutes before turning 30 makes me appreciate the fact that I live in the real world and not the world presented in this film. Starring Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield and Keira Knightley this film follows three students of the Hailshem School through the three phases of their short lives.  The world they live in is much like our own with the exception that it  has followed a different scientific route. I am trying to keep as much of the film secret as possible as I feel it works better not knowing exactly where it is going on, however you will know within a few minutes of starting it the direction it is taking.
Never Let Me Go is mostly focused on the love triangle involving the three main characters as they battle for not just their hearts but their very survival. The film is beautiful, haunting, sad and incredibly acute in it’s analysis of our life.
The strongest aspect of the film (other than an amazingly tight script) is the performances of its three central leads. Carey Mulligan is perfectly vulnerable, wise and honest in the main role. Andrew Garfield who I had only previously seen in The Social Network is outstanding in this movie. After seeing him in the Fincher film I thought he was an adequate actor. After this, I think he is going to be a serious player in the future of film. Some of the emotions he hits are very raw and real and done with seeming ease. Rounding out the threesome is Keira Knightley, an actress I previously thought of as cute and serviceable in easy roles. I was very impressed by her work this time .She revealed range I previously thought unreachable for her.
This movie is moving and thought provoking. Director Mark Romanek has crafted a movie I look forward to revisiting very soon.  It is perfect for a couple who wants a little romance and a little something different.

Cyrus

Cyrus official Movie Poster 
Cyrus is the pretty entertaining indie comedy from the Duplass Brothers. It is the story of John (played by John C Reilly), a man who has spent the last seven years since his divorce in a tailspin of depression. He is constantly around his ex-wife (Catherine Keener) and her fiancé. At her urging he goes to a party and meets Molly (Marisa Tomei). The two hit it off and start a relationship. Everything is going well until John meets Molly's son Cyrus. Cyrus is a 22 year old unsuccessful musician that lives at home and completely controls his mothers life. Cyrus is played in a more understated performance by Jonah Hill. This is the first time I have seen much potential for growth in Hill's acting ability. He does well going between, funny, sad and completely creepy.
 
The movie works really well because it avoids a lot of the standard romantic comedy clichés. Some of it feels like a Meet The Parents type comedy where everything that can go wrong does and the tension builds and builds. However being from the Duplass brothers the formula is a little skewed and plays out more painfully realistic than painfully over the top. A large portion of the script was improvised. Reilly has a history of being an incredible improviser and does well. It only hurts the film occasionally when some of the scenes can seem to go on just a bit too long. Overall the acting is very strong. The characters though weird are likeable (with the exception of Cyrus). If you are a fan of offbeat comedies this film works well.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

The Fighter

"the fighter poster"David O Russell’s The Fighter is a very well made conventional feel good sports film. I will admit initially I was hesitant to see it. I am not the biggest sports film fan as I feel like they are all pretty much the same. Boxing movies are no exception. I feel like after Rocky 1 and 2, we saw the two ways a boxing movie could end and we have been on repeat ever since. (The obvious exception is Million Dollar Baby and I would have been really surprised if this movie ended the same way.)
The good; the acting is very strong. Christian Bale was exceptional as the drug addled Dicky, brother of Mark Wahlberg’s Mickey Ward. Bale is always like a chameleon in film and this is no exception. The tole this guys body must take jumping between roles Is insane. I was a hug fan of John Hawke’s understated performance as Teardrop in Winters Bone, but I can see why the Academy voted for Bale as he has much showier performance. Melissa Leo is outstanding as Mickey and Dickey’s overbearing terrible mother. The only drawback to her part is she is so despicable it was painful every time she was on screen. Amy Adams plays Mickey’s headstrong girlfriend and is a perfect foil to Mickey’s family. I am starting to think it is impossible for Amy Adams to not be charming and wonderful in every role she takes on.
With all these great performances we get to one bad point. All of these supporting roles are incredibly strong and scene stealing. They make it easy to forget about Mark Wahlberg in the title role of The Fighter, Mickey Ward. He plays his part well and I understand his performance. But when the protagonist of the film is so passive and easily manipulated it can be frustrating. Especially in the midst of all these powerhouses.
The movie is fairly conventional as a sports film. It hits all of the notes you would expect. But it does do it quite well and the ending worked for me big time. Some of the drug abuse storyline with Bale is pretty tame, but it is ok since it is not the main focus of what this movie is. It’s about family and it is most importantly about believing in yourself. While not perfect, you would have to be pretty damn cynical to not be moved by the finale.

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Buried

Buried Poster 5
Buried is a movie that could have been a masterpiece of suspense. It definitely had things about it that I admired but I think it failed as a whole to live up to its potential. Instead of a classic, I think it is a fairly solid film that will not be for everyone.
First the good; Ryan Reynolds actually shows some pretty impressive acting chops. I have never disliked the guy; he has been funny in his movies and is always likeable. He has just never been a draw for me to see a movie. Considering 100% of Buried features Reynolds in a coffin, his performance is important. He portrays very well the claustrophobia and terror of his predicament. I commend Reynolds and the director Rodrigo Cortes for taking a film that is simply a guy buried alive and turning it into a very intense movie that is never ever boring. The camera work inside that coffin is very inventive and used effectively to ratchet up the tension.
While the movie is all about Reynolds, there are supporting actors whom we hear on the phone. They are all pretty effective in their various roles, especially considering we never even see them.
The bad; while Reynolds does a very good job acting, the script does him a major disservice. He’s a pretty big jerk. Now I am not going to fault a guy for having a bad attitude when he has been buried alive, but there were many moments in the first 30 minutes of the movie where he frustrated the hell out of me with the way he was talking to people on the phone. I just kept thinking if you would stop screaming at people you may get better help. I have two other complaints. First off, there is a scene involving a snake that pops up in the second act that really strained believability for an otherwise reality based thriller. The last complaint, the film is incredibly cynical. Every possible way a person could screw him over, they do. Every possible way a corporation or the government could be evil it does. I didn’t think the political stuff was completely necessary in this story. None of the politics in the film offended me, I just felt like it made the entire world other than Reynolds character Paul the enemy. It felt like there was no possibility for a light at the end of this dark tunnel.
I would suggest checking this out if you are interested in seeing a Cortes and Reynolds take a risk and do something very different. Just remember the tone is unrelenting (not a bad thing) and desperate. But the pacing and acting are very impressive. The last line of the film is haunting and effective and wraps up the movie very well.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Jack Ass 3D

Sometimes a movie comes along that causes a shift in cinema. Citizen Cane, Pulp Fiction, Toy Story, Easy Rider. These come along at just the right moment with a bold new vision or new way of doing something old. In 2010 Johnny Knoxville and Dickhouse productions released the movie Jack Ass 3D and it was not one of those films.
 
Obviously.
 
However, it was a very funny albeit disturbing experience. I am not sure why I like these movies or what it says about me, but I have to admit, I think they are pretty hilarious. I don't think they are lasting movies and not something I want to watch over and over but, when the credits rolled my cheeks were sore from laughing. That is cheeks on my face by the way, I am just throwing that out there considering the movie I am talking about.
 
Jack Ass 3D does not really need a review. You either think these guys are funny or you don't. I cant imagine someone who doesn't enjoy them at all being convinced by a review that they should spend time watching these dudes embarrass, humiliate, injure and prank one another. I didn't see the film in 3D because I can not stand the 3D trend going on right now and don't feel like anything was really lost for me.
 
If you liked the other two movies this one was on par with them. If you didn't like them or even see them, this one is no different. There is a lot of people getting hit in the crotch, a lot of poop flying, people being injured by animals, ingesting bodily fluids, urinating on each other and a large amount of male nudity. Pretty much it is all very highbrow sophisticated stuff.

Friday, March 4, 2011

127 Hours

"127 hours movie poster"127 Hours opens and closes with montages of people in mass. People on the street, people in stadiums, at worship, people interacting and living amidst each other. It is a great contrast to the life of the central character in the film, Aron Ralston. He is a man that is mainly concerned with one thing, himself. Ralston is played brilliantly by James Franco in an Oscar nominated performance. Out of the performances I have seen so far this year, it should have won in my book. The progression his character goes through in this film is brought ot life perfectly. For a movie mainly concerned with a man stuck in a crevice it is amazingly fast paced and engaging.
 
Going into the movie I was excited to see how well the it would work because I was a big fan of James Franco and Director Danny Boyle. This was Boyles follow up to his Best Picture winner Slumdog Millionaire. I had been intrigued by Ralstan's story back in 2003 when it first happened. I was impressed by this man's ability to do the unthinkable to survive, but also always thought he was just kind of an idiot for having gone out there by himself without telling anyone where he was. Franco's portrayal of him really makes the audience connect with Ralstan. As the days go by, Ralstan's struggle to survive becomes more precarious, his hallucinations become more severe, his memories flood into the film and his confessions to his video camera become more and more candid. These devices allow a window into Ralstan's mental and physical life.
 
Boyle and screenwriter Simon Beaufoy do a wonderful job of showing the importance of community and connections with each other by showing a man completely alone. It comments on the effect that selfishness and carelessness with the way we relate to each other can have on our lives. The film does build to the climax that everyone is expecting and possibly dreading. It is shocking and uncomfortable but done in a way that is not sensationalist or just for shock. Most of it is only heard and done just off screen.
 
I highly recommend seeing this film for Boyle's direction, Franco's tour de force performance and a story that is surprisingly emotional and inspiring.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

How Long Were The Speeches at the Oscars?

Steve Murray at the National Post put together this infographic regarding the speeches at the Oscars this year. I thought it was interesting, especially the sections in red where the speakers were talking while the band was trying to usher them off of the stage.



Here is a link to the full article:
http://arts.nationalpost.com/2011/02/28/graphic-oscar-speeches-dissected/

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Winter's Bone

Winter's Bone is a dark fascinating look at a crime ridden rural landscape. The movie follows a 17 year old girl (played perfectly by Jennifer Lawrence) trying to track down her father who may be dead in the hopes of saving the family home and being able to take care of her two younger siblings.  It is very similar in style to mystery/detective films of the past. Instead of an adult male detective you have a teenage girl and in place of the mean streets of a rainy city you have the mountain environment of an underprivileged drug addicts.
The setting is bleak and the characters are desperate. The stakes are very high as the young protagonist struggles to do everything she can to find her father and save her brother and sister. This is one of the best independent films I have seen in a very long time. The plot is simple and straightforward and told in an incredibly tight form. The people are the focus and even the smallest roles seem so layered and real. I was blown away by all the performances. At one point Lawrence’s character Ree visits an army recruiter in hopes of getting money for her family by enlisting and the recruiter is played outstandingly. This actor has only moments of screen time and is able to produce a fully formed character that seems pulled from a documentary rather than a narrative film. He is just but one example of the many outstanding performances in the film.
John Hawkes who is an always solid character actor turns in a great performance as Ree’s uncle Teardrop. He is a frightening and complex man torn by his loyalty to his life, his family and his addiction. The two’s journey together is a unique thing to watch and very well scripted.
The movie has been nominated for several Academy Awards (including Best Picture and nods for Lawrence and Hawkes) and worthy of all the praise it can get. It is a dark and rewarding film that should have been released to a much larger audience than it was offered to. For almost the entire running time there is a sense of dread that is strong to the point of draining. You know that this story will not likely turn out well. But thanks to the incredible performance of Jennifer Lawrence you never want to turn away. You want to follow her as far as she is willing to go to find justice or at least survival for her family.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work

Joan Rivers Poster

Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work is an entertaining interesting movie. Interesting mostly because it is way better than a documentary about Joan Rivers should be. Like most people of my generation, Joan Rivers was just that crazy old lady that made fun of celebrities (mostly on E!) at Hollywood events. The movie revealed her to be a much more interesting character than that. Her story was surprising, I had no idea about her history as a standup comedian. I had no idea that at one point she was somewhat of a groundbreaking female comedian who spoke about things that women in polite society were not supposed to discuss.

It is obvious in the film that she is the type of person who feels very comfortable playing the victim role. While you do feel sad for her in many moments you can also see that she somewhat relishes being “oppressed” or “mistreated”.

I suggest watching for a few reasons. You get a glimpse of her as a person rather than just a caricature. You see her as a vulnerable, insecure, working comedian. You get to see her actually being funny which was mostly foreign to me up to this point. It works as a portrait of a woman in entertainment and how difficult that world can be for an older female.











5 Movies that Should Have Won Best Picture

Since we are a day away from the Oscars I decided to post a little about some past awards. Sometimes the Oscars get it wrong. Actually it’s more often than not. But, some of the big mistakes in my opinion are as follows. I am not going to include any movies I feel were the best of the year and not even nominated. These are all movies that were nominated but lost.

1)In 1990 Dances with Wolves won Best Picture. Dances With Wolves is fine, I don’t mean to knock it, however the film it beat is not just the best mafia movie ever but one of the best movies of all time.

Goodfellas

Goodfellas is an amazingly fast paced hard edged look at three decades of life in the mafia. It was based on the true story of wiseguy turned informant Henry Hill. It followed his rise and fall during the 60s 70s and 80s. The cast was perfect, the soundtrack amazing, and it served as a pretty good blueprint for The Sopranos. I love The Sopranos but it is very reminiscent of Scorsese's masterpiece of the mafia genre. Speaking of cast, this is hands down Joe Pesci's best performance ever. "Am I a clown, am I here to amuse you?"






2) Four years later the Academy dropped the ball on another crime drama. One very influenced by Goodfellas but very different. In 1994 the award went to Forrest Gump. Gump is a cute film and entertaining, but it was nowhere near as visionary, challenging and original as Quentin Tarentino's

Pulp Fiction.

Fiction was unlike anything that had come before it. It borrowed from many influences of course (as a lot of Tarentino bashers like to point out) but it assembled them a completely original way. Like Goodfellas, the pacing, editing, soundtrack and cast are outstanding. Scorsese and Tarentino are both geniuses when it comes to assembling a soundtrack. John Travolta, Sam Jackson, Uma Thurman, Bruce Willis, Harvey Keitel, Christopher Walken and more fill out the cast of criminals and low lifes whose lives intersect over a few days in California. This movie is incredibly re watchable and just as fresh as it was when originally released. It's only fault is the countless copycat movies that came out afterwards that were almost all terrible. A side note, another better film that lost to Gump that same year, The Shawshank Redemption.

3) The Academy loves romantic epics and often gives them the award over much more deserving films. 1996 was no exception. The long, boring and completely forgettable The English Patient beat out the wonderful Coen Brother's classic

Fargo

Fargo is a dark black hilarious comedy thriller. It's a movie I can watch over and over and always find new things to love. Francis McDormand is hilarious and believable in her Oscar winning role as Marge Gunderson, the very pregnant Midwestern cop trying to catch a couple of killers who have come through her town on a kidnapping job gone wrong. The cast of Coen brothers regulars are hilarious dark and shocking. It is very similar to the film that won the brothers their Best Picture statue years later, No Country For Old Men. Although this film was a lot funnier than the even darker No Country.




4) In1998 Shakespeare In Love won. It's an ok romantic comedy that is also pretty forgotten. Yet somehow it beat out the Spielberg WWII epic,

Saving Private Ryan

Saving Private Ryan is mostly remembered for the intense, extremely graphic and realistic recreation of D Day. While that sequence is sobering and engaging and kicks off the film strongly, the rest of the movie in my opinion is just as strong. It raises a lot of great questions about war, the value of a life and the destruction of men in battle. It also contains a good performance from Tom Sizemore right before he kind of fell off the map and landed in a jail and rehab over and over.





5)The final movie on my list that should have won, lost in 2000. That year the Ridley Scott throwback to sand and sword epics of the past Gladiator nabbed the award. Gladiator is an entertaining movie. The battles are fast paced and violent, Russel Crowe is at his best as Maximus, the soldier turned slave. However, it is also pretty cheesy and by the numbers. The movie that should have won was

Traffic
Movie poster with five people shown from the neck up. The man on the left has his pointer finger pressed against his lips; the woman to his right has long hair and is smiling; the three man at the right have grim looks as they stare to the right. Below them are several vehicles and a man holding a gun that is getting shot. The top of the image includes the starring credits, while the bottom includes the title of the film and the main credits.
Traffic directed by Steven Soderbegh was an American adaptation of the British miniseries Traffik. The original covered the opium, heroin trade. The new version was focused on the drug world in America and Mexico. It had multiple plots all shot in a different colored filters to guide the audience through the huge world of police, politicians, drug dealers, socialites, drug users and their families. It was huge in scope yet very focused on it's characters. Traffic won the Academy Awards for Best Director, Best Editor and Best Screenplay. So while they thought it was the best written, directed and edited film, they somehow came to the conclusion it was not the best film.

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Waiting For Superman

waiting-for-superman-posterDavis Guggenheim’s follow up to his excellent Academy Award winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth is another very well made, very strong film perfect for raising discussion. Like his previous film this documentary is about an important issue. This topic, however, is one that is not as politically dividing as his movie on climate change. (A side note, it is called climate change now, because global warming causes a lot of people to misunderstand the issue.)
Waiting For Superman takes a look at the education system in America. It takes aim at many of the flaws that are prevalent in our system. It is told in a very savvy and entertaining way. It looks at the bureaucracy of the system, the teachers unions and the rise of Charter schools. The biggest fault of the film comes towards the end. The movie spends its running time describing the issues but by the end you realize it has not done enough, in terms of suggesting a solution.
The strongest portion of the film is also its emotional core. It follows a selection of children across the country entering lotteries in the hopes of gaining a spot for their children in the overcrowded Charter schools. All of the children are worthy of the best education possible and watching the hope and despair that comes along with their situation is heart wrenching.
This is an important film no matter what you believe about the state of our schools or the reason we have gotten to this point. The movie raises discussion about one of the most important issues in life, the well being and future of our children and nation.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Movies I Love: Little Children

little children
I remember back in late 1999 hearing so much buzz about this new movie coming out called American Beauty. All of the critics were raving about it and it had a very intriguing poster. If I remember correctly the poster was a a picture of a stomach and a rose. Around this image were paragraphs of rave reviews from pretty much every major film critic and a lengthy list of critic circle awards it had won. For a film geek, this was exciting, they were selling this as the greatest movie of all time. It even went on to win a bunch of Academy Awards.
 
I am not knocking that movie, but when I saw it I was a little let down. It was good, had amazing performances from all the main cast and was cleverly scripted. But it didn't move me, it didn't blow me away like I had expected. I bring this up, because a movie came out a few years later that dealt with a lot of the same themes. It was a look at suburbia, family, infidelity, criminals, redemption, secrets, hopes. Like other films had done (namely American Beauty and Blue Velvet) it was a look at the underbelly of suburban life.
 
Little Children did exactly for me what I wanted American Beauty to do those years earlier. It blew me away. Megan and I watched it one night on DVD, I had picked it up at a used book store because I had heard good things about it and remembered it had garnered some Oscar Buzz. We started the film and were sucked into this world within the first few minutes. A lot of times people will accuse movies with narration of being lazy. This is not one of those movies. The narration actually adds another great layer to the film. It is a God voice, not of any of the characters. It gives the movie an almost surreal documentary feel. As if we are with a crew secretly filming these people. When the film ended I called a friend of mine and instead of suggesting that he watch this movie, I demanded that he come over the next evening and watch it with us again. He was unsure at first that it sounded interesting but like Megan and I the night before, within minutes new he was watching something exceptional.
 
Director Todd Field guides us through this suburban landscape expertly. The leads, Kate Winslet (perfect as always) and Patrick Wilson play two unhappy married people struggling with the fact that their dreams have not come true. They find each other at the playground and neighborhood pool where they routinely take their children and immediately respond to each other. They see in each other what they want in their spouses. Meanwhile, Jackie Earle Hailey; in a powerful, sad and creepy performance, is a recently released sex offender who is constantly tormented by an ex cop obsessed with running him out of their safe ideal world. Hailey is joined by Phyllis Somerville, in a heartbreaking performance as his mother, who just wants her son to be normal and in her words, "Be a good boy".
 
As these peoples lives intersect and slowly unravel the film builds to an emotional climax that without spoiling it will leave you haunted and conflicted and definitely discussing. This was the movie American Beauty could have been, it is a very funny, very disturbing (like Beauty) but also emotionally engaging and affecting.  
 
 

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Due Date

Due Date Poster - due-date photo
The new comedy from The Hangover director Todd Phillips, Due Date may not be to the level of that movie but is very funny for most of its run. Robert Downey Jr and Zack Galifinakis are both well cast as the films leads and have a chemistry that really pushes the film forward. Watching Due Date I kept thinking of two previous movies.

First off, Zack Galifinakis is not technically playing the same character he portrayed in The Hangover but the only difference I can see is his name. He essentially has all the same character traits that made us laugh last time. I don’t know how long he can get by playing the same dude every time but he doesn’t seem to have worn out his welcome yet. Just watching him walk is hilarious.

The second movie I kept thinking about was the amazing 1980’s John Hughes film Planes Trains and Automobiles. The plot is almost exactly the same. Two guys are stuck on a trip across country with one another. One is a jerk (Steve Martin, Robert Downey Jr) and the other is a heavyset nightmare who has a good heart in the end (John Candy, Zack Galifinakis). They hit many of the same notes but since this was made in 2010 everything is amped up to even more unbelievable extremes.

Due Date clearly takes the character from The Hangover and throws him through a loose remix of Planes Trains and Automobiles, but for the most part it works. I was laughing really hard for almost the whole time. However in the last 30 minutes the movie does contain an escape from authorities that diminished the rest of the film. I just couldn’t stop thinking there is no way they could get away with this.

Overall if you are a fan of Galifinakis or Todd Phillips this is worth checking out.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

I Am Comic


Director Jordan Brady’s I Am Comic is a funny behind the scenes look at the world of standup comedy. It mostly consists of a combination of interviews with comics from the last 3 decades and footage of them performing. While it may not be the most illuminating look at the development of comedy, the interviews and standup provide consistent laughs for the entire runtime.
                It covers a lot of information already provided in other films. Jerry Seinfeld’s Comedian devoted an entire movie to cover an artist’s developing and honing a new act to perfection. The Aristocrats gave us a look behind the scenes of the comedy world by way of showing a multitude of comics working the same bit. Judd Apatow’s severely underrated Funny People showed us the life of people whose job it is,  is to make people laugh and the neurosis and dysfunction that comes along with the profession. So while I Am Comic might not be bringing a lot new to the conversation it is entertaining due mostly to the laugh per minute ratio it maintains.
                There are some standout moments. Sarah Silverman and Roseanne discussing being offensive and the limits of good or bad taste is perfect. I mean who else could talk about this. (George Carlin is dead, so he was not able to appear.) It was also great to see Carlos Mencia confronted about his stealing of material. I would rather see him confronted about not being funny, but that’s just me. Surprisingly he seems very very proud of his joke theft.
                The narrator of the film is Ritch Shydner. He was a popular comedian in the 80s who walked away from comedy in the early 90s. Throughout the film we watch him try to restart his career taking small timeslots in small comedy clubs in an attempt to work out his act. It is endearing to watch but also a little awkward. The awkwardness stems from the simple fact that he is not very funny. It certainly is not like watching Seinfeld in the aforementioned Comedian.
                It may not be revelatory but it is an entertaining way to spend an hour and a half.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Movies I Love: Three Great Horror Movies

It's been a slow week in terms of movie watching. I have not actually seen anything new. With the exception of a movie I watched with my kids about a dog and boy running from a gang of crooks that was not worth writing about. So I thought I would throw out a list of some of my favorite horror flicks since I dig horror movies and never talk about them on account of them scaring the crap out of my wife. There are many more I would have liked to mention and probably will in time. But as a starter here you go:

Watch The Descent Movie Trailer

The Descent
A crazy claustrophobic nightmare of a movie. The two best things about the movie are that the "monsters" that come into the film are actually kind of plausible and the movie is actually horrifying way before they show up. The sense of dread that sets in moments after the group of female adventurers are trapped by a cave in never lets up. It is the last really great horror film I have seen lately. Movie studios are more into pumping out bad sequel after bad sequel. Actually, this movie got one of those too but I didn't waste my time with it. If you watch it, make sure you see the original directors version of the film with the better ending. It was changed for it's American theatrical run.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre - 11 x 17 Movie Poster - Style A

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre
The low budget and faux based on a true story premise make this one hell of scary movie. I remember the first time I saw it being blow away and how real it seemed. The events are insane, yes but it looked like a movie that a psychotic person made with a home video and some inmates at an asylum. None of the sequels or remakes came close to the brutal intensity of this one.  The cast is filled with non professionals and it is obvious at points but they do their jobs well. The insane family in this film truly feels insane and in 1970's rural Texas plausible.



Pet Semetary
Out of the movies on this list, this one is the one that actually scared me the most. I remember lying in bed as a child and being scared out of my mind just thinking about Pet Semetary. I knew any minute Zelda was going to come running out of the corner screaming, "I'll twist your back like mine." This is hands down one of the most faithful adaptations of a Stephen King novel. The novel itself is a great read I suggest to anyone. It works on a lot of levels a two hour horror film can't. It is a very scary, movie, but it is a terrifying and moving book. The story is simple, a family moves into a small town and their young son is killed by a truck. Racked with grief the father takes him to an old burial site that is told to have the powers to bring back the dead. The father, family and neighbors soon find out that sometimes dead is better.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Movies I Love: Raising Arizona

File:Raising-Arizona-Poster.jpg                Ok, so in addition to writing reviews of movies I have already seen, I have decided to also write about some of my favorite films. The first one I want to comment on is the Coen Brother’s film, Raising Arizona. Who knew kidnapping a baby could be so funny?
                I have a feeling that throughout this series I am going to come back to the Coen Brothers again and again. I figure what better place to start than the 1987 comedic masterpiece Raising Arizona. This is one of those movies I watched over and over growing up. I loved it. Luckily, Raising Arizona is different than a lot of movies I loved as a kid, it holds up 100%. It’s no Red Dawn. Man I remember thinking that movie was so cool. Too bad, that didn’t hold up. Raising Arizona on the other hand has changed in another way. It was a movie that I laughed at and enjoyed as a kid. Now as an adult I am happy to say, it makes me laugh even harder. So much I didn’t pick up on as a kid is apparent now.
                I am trying to completely avoid hyperbole here so take this to be an honest opinion; every single shot of this film is perfect. Every performance is spot on, and the plot is extremely fast paced and hilarious. I am watching it at this vary minute and honestly can’t see a single wasted shot or bad choice.
                I love the Coen Brothers and will admit to being biased towards them, but in regards to this movie I really feel it is pretty much flawless. Allright maybe there was a bit of hyperbole. There are two tiny mistakes, Nathan Arizona says Nathan Junior slept in jammies when we saw him in a diaper and when H.I. flies through a windshield there is no glass. But other than those two small quibbles, I have no other problem with this film.
                Nicholas Cage has made probably more bad movies than good, but you can always count on him to bring everything to his performance. This is no exception. He is hilarious as the high strung criminal who is completely unable to turn his life around.  On top of that, his narration is perfect and serves to raise the film to an almost poetic level comedy never reaches.  Holly Hunter is perfect as his partner in life and crime.
                The rest of the cast is just as good. John Goodman and William Forsyth are hilarious and way over the top as H.I.’s prison friends.  Francis McDormand has a hysterical cameo as a jealous mother who wants the baby for her own.
                Kill Bill Volume 2 has an incredible fight in a trailer that is great at showing a fight in a small space. As good as it was it was only borrowing from the fight between Cage, Forsyth, and Goodman here. It is an exciting and hilarious battle.
                I love a movie that gets better and better upon repeat viewings and like most Coen Brothers films this is one of them. If for some reason you have not seen this, rent it now.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Unforgotten: Twenty-Five Years After Willowbrook’

Unforgotten is a very powerful and very sad account of a terrible part of our nation’s history. It is the story of a handful of families that lived through a family member’s life at Willowbrook. The story of Willowbrook is one that his been told many times. The horrors that occurred in the facility have been well documented. The filmmakers make the wise decision of just focusing on these few accounts of how families dealt with before, during and after having siblings and children spending years locked away in this facility that was supposed to care for their disabled relatives.
                Going into the documentary I knew it was going to be rough, but the film effected me more than I originally prepared for. It is sad but amazing to see how these people have dealt with the repercussions of living with not only the repercussions of their family members ailments but the way they were treated for years.
                Watching Unforgotten makes you very grateful for what you have and the abilities we all take for granted. I couldn’t help but think about what I would have done if in the position of some of these families at the time. Would I have sent my child to live with others in the hopes that they could care for them better than I could have?
                 I don’t know, I am lucky enough to have never been faced with these decisions. The one thing that comes through is that these families loved their children and made the best decision they saw available to them at the time. I am just grateful that the choices for these people have been made easier as the establishments we have to care for the disabled have improved.
                The film acts as a snapshot of our national history. One that we have hopefully evolved past.  It is amazing to see that these kids who were at one point deemed helpless have gone on to live instead of rot in an unforgiving landscape like Willowbrook. Unforgotten is now available to view on Netflix Instant Viewing and deserves to be seen.

Bridesmaids Trailer

I am looking forward to this one. Kristen Wigg cracks me up in everything I have seen her in, even movies that were not very good. It will be nice to see her as a lead. Plus the movie is produced by Judd Apatow and directed by Paul Feig (the dudes behind Freaks and Geeks). It will be interesting to see what this genre of movie is like when led by a female cast since we usually just see it through the male perspective. The cast is made up of a lot of other funny actresses like Maya Rudolph, Wendi McLendon-Covey and Ellie Kemper.  Jon Hamm also has a small role.

Check out the trailer below.



Monday, January 31, 2011

Exit Through The Gift Shop

2010 turned out to be a pretty strong year for documentaries. I am still working my way through a lot of them but it has been made easier by Netflix Instant viewing. While Netflix Instant view is slow to get new movies, they seem to be very good at getting documentaries upon their initial DVD/BluRay release. Last night I finally watched Exit Through The Gift Shop. It was an excellent film that deserves its spot as the frontrunner for Best Documentary at the Academy Awards.


The documentary is about the world of street art and the mysterious artist Banksy. Like other docs that have come out this year, the film deals with questions about reality. How much of the film is real and how much is a trick. However in the case of this film, those questions are intentional and they heighten the experience for the viewer. The film focuses on Banksy, a popular street artist who is being embraced by the art world. His rogue art starts selling for insane amounts of money, because collectors decide that his work is genius. Whenever Banksy appears on screen his face is blacked out and his voice is altered to protect his identity. At about the halfway point, the film shifts focus over to Thierry Guetta. Thierry is an aspiring filmmaker who has acquired thousands of hours of footage of street artists filmed over the better part of a decade. His plan was to make a documentary about street art but in reality he just filled box after box with tapes that he has not watched. This is all brought to a screeching halt when Thierry compiles the footage into a rough cut of a documentary and shows it to Banksy. Banksy tells him it is unwatchable. This is when the film really gets interesting as the rest of the running time is devoted to the creation of an artist. I don't want to spoil everything in the movie so I wont say more about the plot.


The movie is very funny and cleverly edited. The main protagonist of the film (Thierry) is humorous in his childlike idealism and naivety.  He is presented as a fairly dimwitted but likeable guy and serves as an entertaing tourguide through the "street" and "legitimate" art worlds. What makes someone a great artist? What makes great art? How do you decide the worth of something so subjective? What makes a film a good film? Exit Through The Gift Shop acts as a prank on the art world and the viewer as well. 

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Academy Award Nominations

Andrew Garfield and Jesse Eisenberg in 'The Social Network'

The Academy Award nominees were announced this morning. Looking at the list of nominations a few things struck me.
1) I am really behind on seeing movies this year.
2) Having ten movies up for best picture is still as dumb as it was last year.
3) I hate it when people in leading roles get pushed into the supporting spot. Mark Ruffalo was the lead male in The Kids Are Allright just like Hailee Steinfeld was the lead female in True Grit.
4) Where was Jullianne Moore? I thought she was as good, if not better than Annette Benning in the Kids Are Allright.
5) Why was Scott Pilgrim completely ignored in at least the special effects and editing categories?
Anyway, below is the list of nominees. It looks like I have got to see a lot of movies in the next few weeks.

Best Motion Picture of the Year
Black Swan
The Fighter
Inception
The Kids are All Right
The King's Speech
The Social Network
127 Hours

Toy Story 3
True Grit
Winter's Bone


Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role
Annette Bening (The Kids are All Right)
Nicole Kidman (Rabbit Hole)
Jennifer Lawrence (Winter's Bone)
Natalie Portman (Black Swan)
Michelle Williams (Blue Valentine)


Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role
Javier Bardem (Biutiful)
Jesse Eisenberg (The Social Network)
Colin Firth (The King's Speech)
James Franco (127 Hours)
Jeff Bridges (True Grit)


Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role
Christian Bale (The Fighter)
John Hawkes (Winter's Bone)
Jeremy Renner (The Town)
Mark Ruffalo (The Kids are All Right)
Geoffrey Rush (The King's Speech)


Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role
Amy Adams (The Fighter)
Helena Bonham Carter (The King's Speech)
Melissa Leo (The Fighter)
Hailee Steinfeld (True Grit)
Jacki Weaver (Animal Kingdom)


Best Animated Feature Film of the Year
How to Train Your Dragon
The Illusionist
Toy Story 3


Best Documentary Short Subject
Killing in the Name
Poster Girl
Strangers No More
Sun Come Up
The Warriors of Qiugang


Best Short Film (Animated)
Day & Night Teddy Newton
The Gruffalo Jakob Schuh and Max Lang
Let's Pollute Geefwee Boedoe
The Lost Thing Shaun Tan and Andrew Ruhemann
Madagascar, carnet de voyage (Madagascar, a Journey Diary) Bastien Dubois


Best Short Film (Live Action)
The Confession Tanel Toom
The Crush Michael Creagh
God of Love Luke Matheny
Na Wewe Ivan Goldschmidt
Wish 143 Ian Barnes and Samantha Waite


Achievement in Art Direction
Alice in Wonderland
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1
Inception
The King's Speech
True Grit


Achievement in Cinematography
Black Swan (Matthew Libatique)
Inception (Wally Pfister)
The King's Speech (Danny Cohen)
The Social Network (Jeff Cronenweth)
True Grit (Roger Deakins)
Achievement in Costume Design
Alice in Wonderland (Colleen Atwood)
I Am Love (Antonella Cannarozzi)
The King's Speech (Jenny Beaven)
The Tempest (Sandy Powell)
True Grit (Mary Zophres)


Achievement in Directing
Darren Aronofsky (Black Swan)
David O. Russell (The Fighter)
Tom Hooper (The King's Speech)
David Fincher (The Social Network)
Joel and Ethan Coen (True Grit)


Best Documentary Feature
Exit through the Gift Shop Banksy, director (Paranoid Pictures)
Gasland Josh Fox, director (Gasland Productions, LLC)
Inside Job Charles Ferguson, director (Representational Pictures)
Restrepo Tim Hetherington and Sebastian Junger, directors (Outpost Films)
Waste Land Lucy Walker, director (Almega Projects)


Achievement in Makeup
Barney's Version
The Way Back
The Wolfman


Achievement in Film Editing
Black Swan (Andrew Weisblum)
The Fighter (Pamela Martin)
The King's Speech (Tariq Anwar)
127 Hours (Jon Harris)
The Social Network (Kirk Baxter and Angus Wall)


Best Foreign Language Film of the Year
Biutiful (Mexico)
Dogtooth (Greece)
In a Better World (Denmark)
Incendies (Canada)
Hors la Loi (Algeria)


Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures (Original Score)
How to Train Your Dragon (John Powell)
Inception (Hans Zimmer)
The King's Speech (Alexandre Desplat)
127 Hours (A.R. Rahman)
The Social Network (Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross)


Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures (Original Song)
"Coming Home" from Country Strong Music and Lyric by Tom Douglas, Troy Verges and Hillary Lindsey
"I See the Light" from Tangled Music and Lyric by Alan Menken Lyric by Glenn Slater
"If I Rise" from 127 Hours Music by A.R. Rahman Lyric by Dido and Rollo Armstrong
"We Belong Together" from Toy Story 3 Music and Lyric by Randy Newman


Achievement in Sound Editing
Inception
Toy Story 3
TRON: Legacy
True Grit
Unstoppable


Achievement in Sound Mixing
Inception
The King's Speech
Salt
The Social Network
True Grit


Achievement in Visual Effects
Alice in Wonderland
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1
Hereafter
Inception
Iron Man 2


Adapted Screenplay
127 Hours (Simon Beaufoy and Danny Boyle)
The Social Network (Aaron Sorkin)
Toy Story 3 (Michael Arndt, story by John Lasseter, Andrew Stanton and Lee Unkrich)
True Grit (Joel Coen and Ethan Coen)
Winter's Bone (Debra Granik and Anne Rossellini)


Original Screenplay
Another Year (Mike Leigh)
The Fighter (Paul Attanasio, Lewis Colich, Eric Johnson, Scott Silverand Paul Tamasy)
Inception (Christopher Nolan)
The Kids are All Right (Stuart Blumberg and Lisa Cholodenko)
The King's Speech (David Seidler)

Monday, January 24, 2011

Red State Release Date Change and National Tour

Kevin Smith's Red State premiered this weekend at Sundance and now we just got the news that the theatrical release has been pushed back to October. Smith has decided not to use a studio to release the film and will be handling that himself. He is going to release the film under his new production company, Smodcast Films.
 
However, he is going to be going on a nationwide tour between now and the films release. He is going to be showing the film and following it up with a Q and A session, including himself and various members of the crew and cast. Anybody who is a Smith fan knows that his Q and A sessions are very entertaining. You can actually purchase a few collections of his speaking tours on DVD.
 
It looks like the closest showing to Chattanooga is going to be in Atlanta. Tickets for the tour will be going on sale Friday January 28th.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Looking Forward to Red State

There is a movie coming out in March that I have been waiting to see for about three years now. Kevin Smith started talking about the film Red State shortly after Zach and Miri was released. Since that time he directed another movie (Copout). Copout was the first time he directed a film that was not written by him and the results were by all accounts pretty poor. I personally have not gotten around to seeing it due to the incredibly bad reviews and the way Smith has talked about it since the film was released. My desire to see a film drops substantially when the director himself bashes it.
Regardless of the result of that movie, I have been a huge Kevin Smith fan since his debut Clerks way back in middle school. Being a movie dork at that age, I was awaiting its release excitedly. Of course everyone else I knew had no idea what I was talking about when I told them, “A new director named Kevin Smith has a movie coming out that he shot in the gas station that he worked in. He filmed it nightly after closing, using credit cards to fund the twenty seven thousand dollar budget along with casting all of his friends in the production.”  At some point I am sure their eyes glazed over and they just thought, “Here he goes again.”
So ever since, I have followed his career closely. It is easy to do, since Smith loves talking about every aspect of his life. He has a series of DVD’s that are compilations of him speaking at colleges. While some people have a podcast or maybe two that they produce, Smith has a network with 7 different shows, one show for every day of the week and he is in five of them.
Red State was written shortly after Zach and Miri and Smith had been working ever since on getting the funding to make his dark vision. Red State is unlike anything he has made before. At this point there has been only a teaser released and it is 100% clear that this is nothing like what has come before.
The film revolves around three teenage outcasts who (in the words of Smith himself) venture into the woods looking for sex but instead find God.” He based the tone on a subgenre of 70’s horror films, the devil worship cult movie. In the late 70s and early 80s when the nation was dealing with fears of supposed satanic cults, horror films took the cue and began pumping out films on the subject. Smith has taken the basic idea of a group of teens crossing paths with a satanic cult and flipped it.
What if these teens ran across a group of religious fundamentalist that were as scary as the satanic cult in Rosemary’s Baby?
When it came to finding inspiration it was not hard, Fred Phelps has been making headlines for years now, protesting funerals of gay teens and US soldiers alike. Standing on the side of the road with posters saying things like, “Fags Die God Laughs”. Phelps was the obvious catalyst for a story that goes to horrifying extremes.
He then lined up a cast of promising young actors including Micheal Angarano, Kyle Gallner and Nick Braun. Smith was so impressed with these three young actors, he cast each of them in his upcoming hockey movie, Hit Somebody. The cast also includes some great character actors, Stephen Root (Office Space), Kevin Pollack (The Usual Suspects), and the amazing John Goodman. Melissa Leo, fresh off her golden globe win for her role in The Fighter, stars as one of the cult members.
This leads us to the main star of the film, Michael Parks. Parks plays the role of Abin Cooper, the head of the church and main villain. Parks is a veteran actor who may not be well known to most modern audiences. He caught my eye and the eye of Smith with his role in the Tarantino/Rodriguez collaboration, From Dusk till Dawn. Smith stated he saw him in the opening scene of that film and was blown away. When the scene ended with him being murdered, Smith thought, “Wait a minute, I want to see a movie about that guy.” Luckily, Tarantino and Rodriguez would resurrect that character in four more films after Dawn.
From everything I have heard, Parks blows it out of the water in Red State. His acting showcase is apparently a sermon mid-movie that last over 15 minutes.
I am beyond excited about this flick and am counting down the days to seeing it. In a couple of days, it will premier at the Sundance Film Festival. After that, I just have to hold out until March to see what Mr. Smith’s version of a horror film is.
One last note, I will say for those who are not horror movie fans, Kevin Smith insists this film is not an actual horror film. In his words, “It’s not a horror film; it’s just that horrific things happen.”

Sunday, January 16, 2011

The Social Network

When I first heard about The Social Network I had the same reaction as a lot of people. “A movie about Facebook, how could that be good?” This thought was dismissed fairly quickly when I found out that David Fincher was directing it. I figured, if he is interested in this then there has to be a story there I don’t know about. I am a little biased about the movie do to my love of David Fincher. He has directed some of the best movies of the last 20 years, Fight Club, Seven, and Zodiac. Even his lesser films are interesting and always visually wonderful, Panic Room, Alien 3, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. So knowing Fincher was involved got me interested. Then I found out Aaron Sorkin wrote the screenplay and Trent Reznor was composing the films score. At this point I was pumped about, “that Facebook movie”.
The Social Network ended up being a lot more than just the Facebook movie.
At this point late in the awards season it is a little hard to write a review. The movie has been met with pretty much universal critical acclaim and won almost every critic award out there. So the big question is, does The Social Network live up to the hype? Yes it does, in every way this film deserves the acclaim it has received.
The story is told through a series of flashbacks occurring during two separate depositions. Mark Zuckerberg is being sued by his ex partner/best friend for the way their business relationship dissolved. Simultaneously he is also being sued by three ex Harvard students who claim he stole their idea when creating Facebook. The entire movie consists of a few types of scenes, people talking in offices, people talking in colleges, people talking around computers and people talking in restaurants.
Here is the amazing part; Fincher and crew make it completely involving and fast paced. The direction is tight and focused. The cinematography is beautiful to look at. The score by Reznor, is dark and layered and pushes the film along very well. The dialogue is Sorkin at his rapid fire best.  To top it all off, the acting is very strong. Mark is played by Jesse Eisenburg in easily his best performance to date.
Fincher gives us a film that is a great look at our desire to be connected. Zuckerberg is the best kind of protagonist. He is flawed, he is driven and he wants to change the world. It’s staggering to think when the movie begins in 2003 how much is going to change in the next few years. Facebook has become a part of a majority of American’s (and many abroad) life. It had a huge role in the last presidential election. It is practically unheard of at this point to have a business today that does not have a corresponding Facebook page. This movie shows that a few ambitious people with the right idea at the exact perfect time can change society drastically.
There is a scene towards the end of The Social Network, Mark has just delivered news to his partner that they have received a half million dollar investment. This is it, this is the dream coming true, they are on their way to importance, wealth and fame. Mark hangs up the phone and watches the party going on inside of his house. He is becoming important like he has always wanted yet he is still separated from the people he wants to connect with. He wants people to like him, this is echoed over and over throughout the film. He has created this social network that will supposedly connect us all yet he is still removed from the actual social interaction going on. He looks through the glass unable to connect or relate on an actual personal level.
Regardless of if you like Facebook or even care about Facebook this movie will work for you. It deals with the same themes that make all good stories. It deals with ambition, friendship, betrayal, and power. Fincher has crafted a film that speaks to us all. At this point I have seen the film twice and each time it has led to long discussions afterward about life, technology, business ethics and the future of our society.
Seriously what else could we ask for in a movie?